From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:12:24 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Correct conditions to free textconv result data
Message-ID: <20160222181224.GA4917@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160222180645.GB4587@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 01:06:46PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:

> Is there a case I'm missing here where we actually leak memory or try to
> free non-allocated memory? I didn't see it.

By the way, I saw only patches 2/3 and 3/3 on the list. So maybe there
is something interesting going on in 1/3, or in a cover letter that
didn't make it. :)

-Peff