From: Jeff King Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 08:14:31 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Git doc: GPL2 does not apply to repo data Message-ID: <20160201081431.GA26215@sigill.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <1591708020.2493723.1454312995839.JavaMail.zimbra@imag.fr> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:49:55AM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > For less tech-savvy managers, I found that name dropping works quite well > > (read: naming a couple of well-known companies/products that switched to > > Git). > > In the same category: "GitHub has 12 millions users" works rather well. Who's to say GitHub's business plan isn't to become a copyright troll? :) On a more serious note, this FAQ (and the one right after) might be useful for convincing people: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLOutput Data that git stores is not strictly "output", but I think the answers there are relevant. And presumably written or vetted by lawyers, too. -Peff