From: James McCoy <vega.james@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 01:23:36 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] remote-http(s): Support SOCKS proxies
Message-ID: <20151027012336.GK31271@freya.jamessan.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq7fm9gze2.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:15:17PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > This patch was required to work behind a faulty AP and scraped from
> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15227130/#15228479 and guarded with
> > an appropriate cURL version check by Johannes Schindelin.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> The code looks OK but the last paragraph makes _us_ worried.  What
> is the licensing status of the original at SO?

According to Stackoverflow[0],

  As noted in the Stack Exchange Terms of Service[1] and in the footer of
  every page, all user contributions are licensed under Creative Commons
  Attribution-Share Alike[2]. Proper attribution[3] is required if you
  republish any Stack Exchange content.

[0]: https://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing
[1]: http://stackexchange.com/legal
[2]: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
[3]: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/06/attribution-required/

Cheers,
-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <vega.james@gmail.com>