From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 20:04:54 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Fix inconsistent quotes
Message-ID: <20150429200453.GA750@peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150429190946.GQ5467@google.com>

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:09:46PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Jeff King wrote:
> 
> > But IMHO, using backticks looks much better. In the roff-formatted
> > manpages single quotes underline, but backticks use bold.
> 
> Are you sure?  My copy of git.1.gz has backticks converted into no
> formatting at all:
> 
> 	Other options are available to control how the manual page is displayed\&. See
> 	\fBgit-help\fR(1)
> 	for more information, because
> 	git \-\-help \&.\&.\&.
> 	is converted internally into
> 	git help \&.\&.\&.\&.

It's actually optional. See 5121a6d (Documentation: option to render
literal text as bold for manpages, 2009-03-27). I don't see a good
reason that wasn't made the default early, except conservatism. I've had
it enabled for years (though I admit I don't read the manpages that much
these days :) ).

-Peff