From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 22:31:59 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pretty-format: add append line-feed format specifier
Message-ID: <20140909223158.GD14029@peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <540F7C70.4010909@exec64.co.uk>

On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:17:20PM +0100, Harry Jeffery wrote:

> I definitely prefer your more general solution to my
> bare-minimum-to-scratch-itch patch. I'd certainly be willing to take your
> patch and expand upon it (pun unintended) once Junio has weighed in on your
> suggestions.

Thanks. I am always happy to see contributors willing to pick up and run
with ideas.

It is probably out-of-scope for what you want, but while we are talking
about %d, it may be worth considering whether there is something simple
we can do to make formatting list-like items more flexible. E.g., even
with "%D", you are stuck with the format "foo, bar, baz" for multiple
decorations. Some kind of "%join(%d,; )" might work to produce "foo;
bar; baz" (or whatever you want). But that may also be crossing the line
into insanity, and we would be better to allow some Turing-complete
embedded language like lua. For that matter, conditionals might be
crossing that insanity line, too.

> Regardless of what happens with the conditional expansion I think it would
> definitely be a useful addition to be able to print the decorators without
> the " (...)" wrapper. I think it's general enough that it'd warrant its own
> separate patch rather than being part of a patch series for the conditional
> expansion.

Yeah, I agree it can be separate.

-Peff