From: Jonathan Nieder Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:40:23 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] refs.c: return error instead of dying when locking fails during transaction Message-ID: <20140725194023.GH12427@google.com> In-Reply-To: <1406307521-10339-3-git-send-email-sahlberg@google.com> Ronnie Sahlberg wrote: > --- a/refs.c > +++ b/refs.c > @@ -2214,7 +2214,7 @@ static struct ref_lock *lock_ref_sha1_basic(const char *refname, > */ > goto retry; > else > - unable_to_lock_index_die(ref_file, errno); > + goto error_return; Should probably save last_errno so error_return can pass that information back. Can the caller recover from this error? Does it have enough information to produce the same helpful message as unable_to_lock_index_die? If this could be done without regressing behavior (e.g., by passing back error information as a message instead of through errno) then I think it would make sense. Jonathan