From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:04:32 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] cleanup duplicate name_compare() functions
Message-ID: <20140619080432.GB15698@hudson.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20140618191407.GX8557@google.com>

Jonathan,

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:14:07PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> 
> > Jeremiah Mahler (5):
> >   cache: rename cache_name_compare() to name_compare()
> >   tree-walk.c: remove name_compare() function
> >   unpack-trees.c: remove name_compare() function
> >   dir.c: rename to name_compare()
> >   name-hash.c: rename to name_compare()
> >
> >  cache.h        |  2 +-
> >  dir.c          |  3 +--
> >  name-hash.c    |  2 +-
> >  read-cache.c   | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> >  tree-walk.c    | 10 ----------
> >  unpack-trees.c | 11 -----------
> >  6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> After looking at the patches I suspect this should be a single patch.
> That way it's bisectable, and the changes outside of read-cache.c are
> small enough that it's not too much of a burden to review as a single
> patch.
> 
That would be a pain to bisect if the partial application of the patch
set left the system in a broken state.  Good suggestion.

> The code change looked good.
> 
> Thanks and hope that helps,
> Jonathan

Thanks,
-- 
Jeremiah Mahler
jmmahler@gmail.com
http://github.com/jmahler