From: John Keeping Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 18:46:04 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] t9001: avoid not portable '\n' with sed Message-ID: <20140604184604.GC14457@serenity.lan> In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 10:42:46AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Torsten Bögershausen writes: > > > t9001 used a '\n' in a sed expression to split one line into two lines. > > Some versions of sed simply ignore the '\' before the 'n', treating > > '\n' as 'n'. > > > > As the test already requires perl as a prerequisite, use perl instead of sed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen > > --- > > Hmph. I read this in pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/sed.html > > The escape sequence '\n' shall match a embedded in the > pattern space. > > so it may be better to be a bit more explicit in the log message to > say whose implementation has this issue to warn people. > > > - sed "s/^From:/$header: extra@address.com\nFrom:/" cover-to-edit.patch >"$cover" && > > + "$PERL_PATH" -pe "s/^From:/$header: extra\@address.com\nFrom:/" cover-to-edit.patch | tr Q "$LF" >"$cover" && Note that quoted section of POSIX says "embedded in the pattern space"; under the description of the "s" command, it says: The replacement string shall be scanned from beginning to end. [...] The meaning of a immediately followed by any character other than '&', , a digit, or the delimiter character used for this command, is unspecified. A line can be split by substituting a into it. The application shall escape the in the replacement by preceding it by a . So the portable way to do it is: sed "s/^From:/$header: extra@address.com\ From:/" cover-to-edit.patch >"$cover" && but that requires the continuation to start in column 0, so the Perl variant is probably neater.