From: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 23:11:56 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] builtin/add.c: rearrange xcalloc arguments
Message-ID: <20140526231156.GA8570@hudson.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <1401118436-66090-2-git-send-email-modocache@gmail.com>

Brian,

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:33:42AM +0900, Brian Gesiak wrote:
> xcalloc takes two arguments: the number of elements and their size.
> run_add_interactive passes the arguments in reverse order, passing the
> size of a char*, followed by the number of char* to be allocated.
> Rearrgange them so they are in the correct order.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Gesiak <modocache@gmail.com>
> ---
>  builtin/add.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/builtin/add.c b/builtin/add.c
> index 672adc0..488acf4 100644
> --- a/builtin/add.c
> +++ b/builtin/add.c
> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ int run_add_interactive(const char *revision, const char *patch_mode,
>  	int status, ac, i;
>  	const char **args;
>  
> -	args = xcalloc(sizeof(const char *), (pathspec->nr + 6));
> +	args = xcalloc((pathspec->nr + 6), sizeof(const char *));
>  	ac = 0;
>  	args[ac++] = "add--interactive";
>  	if (patch_mode)
> 

This patch doesn't apply to any of the branches I have available
(master, pu, next).  And there is no line containing "pathspec->nr + 6"
anywhere in my builtin/add.c.  Which branch is your work based off?

-- 
Jeremiah Mahler
jmmahler@gmail.com
http://github.com/jmahler