From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 19:12:31 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 23/44] fetch.c: change s_update_ref to use a ref transaction
Message-ID: <20140516191231.GE12314@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <1400174999-26786-24-git-send-email-sahlberg@google.com>

(+cc: peff for STORE_REF_ERROR_DF_CONFLICT expertise)
Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:

> --- a/builtin/fetch.c
> +++ b/builtin/fetch.c
> @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static int s_update_ref(const char *action,
[...]
> +	transaction = ref_transaction_begin();
> +	if (!transaction ||
> +	    ref_transaction_update(transaction, ref->name, ref->new_sha1,
> +				   ref->old_sha1, 0, check_old) ||
> +	    ref_transaction_commit(transaction, msg, NULL)) {
> +		ref_transaction_rollback(transaction);
>  		return errno == ENOTDIR ? STORE_REF_ERROR_DF_CONFLICT :
>  					  STORE_REF_ERROR_OTHER;
> +	}

I'd rather not rely on errno here (see the previous patch for why).
Is there some other way to distinguish the case where a ref couldn't
be created because there was a prefix of that ref in the way?

For example, maybe ref_transaction_commit could return a different
negative integer in this case.

Thanks,
Jonathan