From: Jeff Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 22:47:49 GMT
Subject: Re: [GUILT v2 13/29] Check that "guilt header '.*'" fails.
Message-ID: <20140515224749.GB1334@meili.valhalla.31bits.net>
In-Reply-To: <1400013065-27919-14-git-send-email-cederp@opera.com>

Signed-off-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net>

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30:49PM +0200, Per Cederqvist wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Per Cederqvist <cederp@opera.com>
> ---
>  regression/t-028.out | 7 +++++++
>  regression/t-028.sh  | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/regression/t-028.out b/regression/t-028.out
> index 1564c09..ea72a3a 100644
> --- a/regression/t-028.out
> +++ b/regression/t-028.out
> @@ -49,3 +49,10 @@ Signed-off-by: Commiter Name <commiter@email>
>  
>  % guilt header non-existant
>  Patch non-existant is not in the series
> +% guilt header .*
> +.* does not uniquely identify a patch. Did you mean any of these?
> +  modify
> +  add
> +  remove
> +  mode
> +  patch-with-some-desc
> diff --git a/regression/t-028.sh b/regression/t-028.sh
> index 88e9adb..2ce0378 100755
> --- a/regression/t-028.sh
> +++ b/regression/t-028.sh
> @@ -31,4 +31,8 @@ done
>  
>  shouldfail guilt header non-existant
>  
> +# This is an evil variant of a non-existant patch.  However, this
> +# patch name is a regexp that just happens to match an existing patch.
> +shouldfail guilt header '.*'
> +
>  # FIXME: how do we check that -e works?
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

-- 
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.