From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:07:14 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Take four on fixing OPT_SET_PTR issues
Message-ID: <20140331210714.GA6422@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq4n2e8eov.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:23:44AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> SET_PTR() may not be used, but are there places where SET_INT() is
> abused with a cast-to-pointer for the same effect?  I didn't check,
> but if there are such places, converting them to use SET_PTR() with
> their existing cast removed may be a better way to go.

Anyone doing that should be beaten with a clue stick.

Fortunately, I grepped through and I did not see any cases. My clue
stick remains untouched.

-Peff