From: Jeff King Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:19:34 GMT Subject: Re: git log omits deleting merges Message-ID: <20140324141934.GA651@sigill.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <5330081C.3090403@gmail.com> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:25:32AM +0100, Ephrim Khong wrote: > Thank you for the explanation, I now understand why this is happening from a > technical point of view. From a usability perspective, it is a bit confusing > that a flag that should intuitively increase the number of shown commits > (--follow) removes a commit from the output. Though this is just a minor > annoyance, so no strong opinion here. Sorry, I focused on the --diff-filter aspect of your question. As for --follow, I think that is less "by design" and more "what happens to occur, because --follow is a bit of a hack". So there may be a bug, or room for improvement in the code there, though if the solution involves turning on diffs for all merges, that may be prohibitively expensive. -Peff