From: Jeff King Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:03:49 GMT Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2014, #02; Tue, 11) Message-ID: <20140312200348.GB1816@sigill.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <20140312193509.GA1816@sigill.intra.peff.net> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 03:35:09PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 03:12:11PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > * jk/warn-on-object-refname-ambiguity (2014-01-09) 6 commits > [...] > Having looked at it again, I really think it is not worth pursuing. The > end goal is not that interesting, there is a lot of code introduced, and > a reasonable chance of accidentally introducing regressions and/or > making the code less maintainable. Keeping the existing code (which > just disables the check for cat-file) is probably the sanest course of > action. We can do a similar thing for "rev-list --stdin" if we want, or > we can wait until somebody complains. Having said that, here are two follow-on patches. The first is an extra cat-file cleanup, and the second adjusts "rev-list --stdin". I am on the fence on both of them, so I will leave it up to your judgement. [1/2]: cat-file: restore warn_on_object_refname_ambiguity flag [2/2]: rev-list: disable object/refname ambiguity check with --stdin -Peff