From: Heiko Voigt Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 20:42:08 GMT Subject: Re: Re* [PATCH] Improvements to git-archive tests and add_submodule_odb() Message-ID: <20131203204208.GC4629@sandbox-ub> In-Reply-To: Hi, On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 10:39:36AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > OK, thanks, then let's do this. Yes, sounds good. Cheers Heiko > -- >8 -- > From: Nick Townsend > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:31:09 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] ref-iteration doc: add_submodule_odb() returns 0 for success > > The usage sample of add_submodule_odb() function in the Submodules > section expects non-zero return value for success, but the function > actually reports success with zero. > > Helped-by: René Scharfe > Reviewed-by: Heiko Voigt > Signed-off-by: Nick Townsend > --- > Documentation/technical/api-ref-iteration.txt | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/technical/api-ref-iteration.txt b/Documentation/technical/api-ref-iteration.txt > index aa1c50f..02adfd4 100644 > --- a/Documentation/technical/api-ref-iteration.txt > +++ b/Documentation/technical/api-ref-iteration.txt > @@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ submodules object database. You can do this by a code-snippet like > this: > > const char *path = "path/to/submodule" > - if (!add_submodule_odb(path)) > + if (add_submodule_odb(path)) > die("Error submodule '%s' not populated.", path); > > -`add_submodule_odb()` will return an non-zero value on success. If you > +`add_submodule_odb()` will return zero on success. If you > do not do this you will get an error for each ref that it does not point > to a valid object. > > -- > 1.8.5-262-g1a2486c >