From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:59:07 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] commit-queue: LIFO or priority queue of commits
Message-ID: <20130610185907.GD2084@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7v1u89iyla.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:56:33AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > or similar. I didn't change the name, either. It may be silly to call it
> > "commit_queue" still since it is now more general. I simply called mine
> > "queue" (I wanted "pqueue", but that conflicted with globals defined by
> > OpenSSL; yours is a more general queue anyway, so maybe that is a good
> > name).
> 
> I agree that it makes sense not to call it either commit-queue or
> pqueue.  While at it, the filenames should probably be moved as
> well, no?

Yeah, definitely. I left all of that as an exercise for you, since the
name change will involve a lot of fallout in the other patches.

-Peff