From: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 20:06:57 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2013, #03; Thu, 6)
Message-ID: <20130607200657.GC31625@goldbirke>
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0mkQqopPBrmO1e20nN_kbNLgcR4cA9z7nOfA4q_2GxvMg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 01:17:28AM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> > because nowadays __git_complete_file() is a wrapper around
> > __git_complete_revlist_file().
> 
> What?  It was never anything different from a poorly-named alias for
> __git_complete_revlist_file().

Again: __git_complete_file() has been there since the completion
script was first included in git.

>  You have already agreed that
> __git_complete_file() is a horrible name, so why not deprecate it?

I am not against deprecating it, and by "it" I mean the function name.

> Whom is this confusion benefiting, and how is it any "cleaner"?

It's clearer because of the reasons I gave in my other email in the
discussion of the patch.

Plus it would avoid commits on master with incorrect commit messages.

> If
> you're arguing about expanding __git_complete_file(), don't do that:
> just write a new function and give it a proper name.

I am not arguing about that.