From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:58:04 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] wt-status: fix possible use of uninitialized variable
Message-ID: <20130321195804.GI29311@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vip4ka5pb.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
>> Jeff King wrote:

>>> +	default:
>>> +		die("BUG: unhandled change_type %d in wt_status_print_change_data",
>>> +		    change_type);
>>
>> Micronit: s/unhandled/invalid/.
>
> I actually think "unhandled" is more correct for this one; we may
> add new change_type later in the caller, and we do not want to
> forget to add a new case arm that handles the new value.

Ok.  Makes sense.