From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:42:42 GMT
Subject: Re: [BUG?] rebase -i: edit versus unmerged changes
Message-ID: <20130320204242.GA29311@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0mgX40oicqxnoa7M3NJP_k8jDrg7mVGyWrg5T+=iRtHQA@mail.gmail.com>

Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Andrew Wong wrote:

>> You can actually rely on "rebase" to run the appropriate command.
>
> Didn't Junio explicitly mention that this is undesirable earlier (from
> the point of view of `rebase -i` design)?

I missed the earlier discussion.  Does the documentation (e.g.,
git-rebase(1)) cover this?  I can't think of any reason off-hand not to
rely on the DWIMery involved in "git rebase --continue".

Curious,
Jonathan