From: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:01:06 GMT
Subject: Re: difftool -d symlinks, under what conditions
Message-ID: <20130313180106.GL2317@serenity.lan>
In-Reply-To: <7vppz32o60.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:40:55AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> writes:
> 
> > git-hash-object(1) implies that it will apply the clean filter and EOL
> > conversion when it's given a path to a file in the working tree (as it
> > is here).  Is that not the case?
> 
> Applying clean to smudged contents _ought to_ recover clean version,
> but is that "ought to" something you would want to rely on?

How does git-status figure out that file that has been touch'd does not
have unstaged changes without relying on this?  Surely this case is no
different from that?


John