From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 23:08:45 GMT
Subject: Re: two-way merge corner case bug
Message-ID: <20130301230845.GA7317@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vppzien3i.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:06:57PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > I can believe it. So do we want to do that fix, then? Did you want to
> > roll up the two halves of it with a test and write a commit message? I
> > feel like you could write a much more coherent one than I could on this
> > subject.
> 
> I actually was wondering if we can remove that sole uses of two-way
> merge with --reset -u from "git am" and replace them with something
> else.  But we do want to keep local change that existed before "am"
> started, so we cannot avoid use of two-way merge, I guess...

Yeah, I think that is a case we definitely want to keep, as it means any
intermediate work done by the user in applying the patch is not lost.

-Peff