From: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:00:46 GMT
Subject: Re: Re* [PATCH 2/2] check-ignore.c: fix segfault with '.' argument from repo root
Message-ID: <20130220020046.GC7860@pacific.linksys.moosehall>
In-Reply-To: <7v1ucc5b7n.fsf_-_@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:56:44AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> writes:
> 
> > Fair enough.  I'll reply to this with a new version.[0]
> >
> > [0] I wish there was a clean way to include the new version inline,
> >     but as I've noted before, there doesn't seem to be:
> >
> >     http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/146110
> 
> I find it easier to later find the patch if you made it a separate
> follow-up like you did, but you can do it this way if you really
> want to, using a scissors line, like so.  Please do not try to be
> creative and change the shape of scissors just for the sake of
> chaning it.

[snipped]

OK, thanks for the information.  IMHO it would be nice if 'git
format-patch' and 'git am' supported this style of inline patch
inclusion, but maybe there are good reasons to discourage it?