From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 05:06:37 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: clarify git-branch --list behavior
Message-ID: <20130201050637.GC29973@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7v4nhweuoi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 04:37:01PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> >> +If `--list` is given, or if there are no non-option arguments, existing
> >> +branches are listed; the current branch will be highlighted with an
> >> +asterisk.  Option `-r` causes the remote-tracking branches to be listed,
> >> +and option `-a` shows both local and remote branches. If a `<pattern>`
> >> +is given, it is used as a shell wildcard to restrict the output to
> >> +matching branches. If multiple patterns are given, a branch is shown if
> >> +any it is matched by any of the patterns.
> >
> > s/if any it is/if it is/
> 
> Thanks; I'll squash this in.  Peff, no need to resend.

Thanks. No matter how many times I proofread a doc change, I always
manage to slip an error into the final version. Hooray for many eyes.

-Peff