From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 10:19:53 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] svn test: escape peg revision separator using empty peg rev
Message-ID: <20121009101953.GB28120@elie.Belkin>
In-Reply-To: <5073F2C0.6000504@drmicha.warpmail.net>

Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder venit, vidit, dixit 09.10.2012 10:41:

>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
>
> Tested with Subversion 1.6.18.
[...]
> I haven't checked other svn versions but this approach looks perfectly
> sensible. It makes us test branch names which can't even be created
> easily with current svn. Does svn really deserve this much attention? ;)

Thanks for the quick and thorough feedback.  I'm glad to hear it seems
sane. ;-)

> Seriously, our tests prepare us well for an svn remote helper...

That might be a good reason to make a mock implementation of the
existing git-svn interface on top of git-remote-svn.  Sounds fun but
hard.

Ciao,
Jonathan