From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:13:26 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make test output coloring more intuitive
Message-ID: <20120919201326.GA23016@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120919201201.GD19246@atlantic.linksys.moosehall>

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:12:01PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:

> > > Sounds reasonable, and I think the new output looks nice. I notice that
> > > skipped tests are still in green. I wonder if they should be in yellow,
> > > too.
> > >
> > What about blue instead?   This would keep the colouring scheme more
> > consistent with the one used by prove:
> >   <http://search.cpan.org/~ovid/Test-Harness/bin/prove>
> > by autotest:
> >   <http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf.html#Using-Autotest>
> > and by the Automake-generated test harness:
> >   <http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/automake.html#Scripts_002dbased-Testsuites>
> 
> Sounds good to me!  Blue is the conventional color for informational
> signs, so seems like a natural fit for skipped tests.  Not sure
> whether it should be bold or not though?  I'll wait for a more solid
> group consensus before re-rolling yet another patch :-)

Blue would be fine with me. No strong opinion on bold or not (my gut is
that most things should not be bold unless there is a good reason, but
that is just a feeling).

-Peff