From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 13:05:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] Clean up how fetch_pack() handles the heads list
Message-ID: <20120909130532.GA27754@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7v7gs3sdjx.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 03:20:18AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> 
> > This patch series depends on the "Add some string_list-related
> > functions" series that I just submitted.
> 
> Makes sense.  The only worry (without reading the series first) I
> have is that the use of string list may make the responsiblity of
> sorting the list fuzzier. I am guessing that we never sorted the
> refs we asked to fetch (so that FETCH_HEAD comes out in an expected
> order), so use of unsorted string list would be perfectly fine.

I haven't read the series yet, but both the list of heads from the user
and the list of heads from the remote should have been sorted by 4435968
and 9e8e704f, respectively.

-Peff