From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 22:02:37 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: Introduce test_seq
Message-ID: <20120803220237.GA14003@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7v3943bsuc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:53:15PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Wouldn't it be cleaner and readable to write it like this
> 
> 	"$PERL_PATH" -le 'print for $ARGV[0]..$ARGV[1]' "$1" "$2"
> 
> by the way?

Yeah, that would be more robust (it's longer to type, which is why I
avoided it in the inline replacement, but since we're factoring it out,
that's not an issue).

-Peff