From: Jeff King Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 20:07:18 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: Introduce test_seq Message-ID: <20120803200718.GA10648@sigill.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <1344024290-9197-1-git-send-email-michal.kiedrowicz@gmail.com> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 10:04:50PM +0200, MichaƂ Kiedrowicz wrote: > Previous patch didn't support `test_seq 1 50` (I removed it accidentally). Our emails just crossed paths. :) > +# test_seq is a portable replacement for seq(1). > +# It may be used like: > +# > +# for i in `test_seq 100`; do > +# echo $i > +# done This should probably note that it is a subset of seq's behavior. You talked about it in the commit message, but the in-code comment is a much more likely thing for a potential user to read. -Peff