From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 17:00:06 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 'No newline...' annotation in rewrite diffs.
Message-ID: <20120803170005.GA24068@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vobmrc49t.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 09:46:22AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> >> Maybe you could introduce "test_seq" instead.
> >
> > I don't have a strong preference, as there are only two callsites. Do
> > you want to make a patch?
> 
> If you run "for . in . . ." in t/, we see quite a many hits, so
> "only two callsites" might be undercounting the candidates.

True. Although a good number of them are not numeric sequences (however
perl being perl, I think my one-liner would take "a" and "g" as
end-points just as readily).

I have no problem with converting them all. I just didn't want to
personally go to the work myself.

-Peff