From: konglu@minatec.inpg.fr
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:59:59 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rebase [-i --exec | -ix] <CMD>...
Message-ID: <20120605195959.Horde.h42jfHwdC4BPzkkfVQizm9A@webmail.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr>
In-Reply-To: <7vhaurt1m6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>


Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> a écrit :


>> +		if orig_head=$(git rev-parse -q --verify "$2") ||
>> +		   test `expr substr "$2" 1 1` = -
>> +		then
>> +			echo "You must specify a command after --exec option\n"
>> +			usage
>> +		else
>> +			if test -n "$cmd"
>> +			then
>> +				cmd="$2,$cmd"
>> +			else
>> +				cmd="$2"
>> +			fi
>> +		fi
>> +		shift
>> +		;;
>
> Are you telling me that I cannot have a branch named "make"?  Drop
> this nonsense, and just write it in a more straightforward way, e.g.
>
> 	-x)
> 		test 2 -le "$#" || usage
>                 cmd="${cmd:+"$cmd$LF"} $2"
>                 shift
>                 ;;
I agree with the fact that the code must not restrain you in naming branches.
But shouldn't we keep the "test `expr substr "$2" 1 1` = -" part so that
options can't be right after the "--exec" ?