From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 15:27:12 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t/Makefile: retain cache t/.prove across prove runs
Message-ID: <20120519152711.GA6979@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FB7B429.80805@alum.mit.edu>

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 04:54:33PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:

> I totally believe you that some of the variations that I listed in my
> commentary don't work in the git context.  I'm not a prove expert; I
> just noticed that removing the .prove file is counterproductive and
> breaks some other prove features.  I also agree with you that it
> would be dangerous to encourage partial testing and that it is
> therefore not a priority to make the use case that you mentioned work
> in the git context.
> 
> I still think my patch makes sense.  The error that Peff pointed out
> was in my commentary, not in the patch itself or in the log message.
> Junio, is there something else keeping you from applying this patch?

Yeah, I hope my comments weren't interpreted as "don't apply this".
Keeping the .prove file around is a prerequisite for lots of clever
things, including some useful (--state=slow) and some less so
(--state=failed). But if the latter case does not work (if we even want
it to), it is because this patch is only the first building block. We
should definitely apply it.

-Peff