From: Jeff King Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:11:51 GMT Subject: Re: push.default: current vs upstream Message-ID: <20120412071150.GB31122@sigill.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <4F7FFD7A.80104@pileofstuff.org> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:40:26AM +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote: > On a slight aside, should we add @{downstream} to describe the opposite > of @{upstream}? Seeing that around the place would give intermediate > users a clue about why pull and push aren't as related as they think, > and would be useful here and there in code (e.g. __git_ps1 could show a > better bash prompt with GIT_PS1_SHOWUPSTREAM). Maybe. I don't really see how it is useful, but maybe you want to flesh our your proposal with some examples? I do not use __git_ps1, so I'm not sure what you want to improve there. -Peff