From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:52:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mv: improve overwrite warning
Message-ID: <20111212215238.GD9754@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vobvd36ms.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:57:31AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > This message looks overly long to me, but I wanted to match the existing
> > messages. Another option would be just:
> >
> >   warning: overwriting 'three/one'
> 
> Yes, I think it makes perfect sense to drop the ugly "source=one destination=two"
> cruft, both for single-source and multiple-source cases.

Yeah, the more I look at the message in the patch I sent, the uglier it
gets. Here's a re-rolled 4 and 5 with the nicer format.

-Peff