From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:40:44 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for-each-ref: add split message parts to %(contents:*).
Message-ID: <20110907174044.GA11341@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110902175323.GA29761@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 01:53:23PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> But there may be other corner cases.  I need to read through the code
> more carefully, which I should have time to do later today.

This ended up a little trickier than I expected, but I think the series
below is what we should do. I tried to add extensive tests, but let me
know if you can think of any other corner cases.

  [1/5]: t7004: factor out gpg setup
  [2/5]: t6300: add more body-parsing tests
  [3/5]: for-each-ref: refactor subject and body placeholder parsing
  [4/5]: for-each-ref: handle multiline subjects like --pretty
  [5/5]: for-each-ref: add split message parts to %(contents:*).

-Peff