From: Michał Górny Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:34:50 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] for-each-ref: add split message parts to %(contents:*). Message-ID: <20110901093450.57512480@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20110831232201.GA29296@sigill.intra.peff.net> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:22:01 -0400 Jeff King wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:54:35PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > +The complete message in a commit and tag object is `contents`. > > > +Its first line is `contents:subject`, the remaining lines > > > +are `contents:body` and the optional GPG signature > > > +is `contents:signature`. > > > > To match the parsing of commit objects, I would prefer to see > > "subject" to mean "the first paragraph" (usually the first line > > alone but that is purely from convention), but that probably is a > > separate topic. > > Good idea. I suspect pretty.c:format_subject can be reused here. Should I fix regular 'subject' and 'body' as well, or just the 'contents:' variants? -- Best regards, Michał Górny