From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 15:28:56 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remote: allow "-t" with fetch mirrors
Message-ID: <20110526152855.GA4120@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <4DDE7116.4070900@viscovery.net>

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 05:26:14PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:

> Am 5/26/2011 17:11, schrieb Jeff King:
> > +	if (mirror && !(mirror & MIRROR_FETCH) && track.nr)
> > +		die("specifying branches to track makes no sense with non-fetch mirrors");
> 
> Don't proliferate no double negation. How about:
> 
> +		die("specifying branches to track makes sense only with fetch mirrors");

I can't fail to not disagree with your logic.

Junio, can you squash it in?

-Peff