From: Jeff King Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:23:02 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] send-pack: avoid deadlock when pack-object dies early Message-ID: <20110426082302.GC26874@sigill.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <4DB5E1CA.8000105@kdbg.org> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:04:10PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote: > > In the comments for 1/2, you said this goes directly on 38a81b4e. But in > > that commit, we use #ifndef WIN32 to decide whether or not to fork for > > async code. So shouldn't this use the same test (I don't even see > > ASYNC_AS_THREAD defined anywhere else)? > > Here's the fixed patch. I squashed both earlier patches into a single patch > because they are about the same topic, as you showed with your tests of > git-push via smart http. Thanks, this one looks good to me, and I think the squash is sensible. > Again, this should go on top of 38a81b4e. When it is merged to f6b60983 or > later, the '#ifndef WIN32' must be changed to '#ifdef NO_PTHREADS'. I see Junio has an evil merge in pu that takes care of this. I wonder if it might have been nicer to "cherry-pick -n" the old fix on top of master, fixing up the tree to use NO_PTHREADS, and then resolving the ensuing merge conflict in favor of the cherry-picked version. . I guess it is just a matter of style (the fact that a few of our archaeology tools do not find content in evil merges very well is a downside, but that just means we should fix the tools :) ). -Peff