From: Jakub Narebski Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:03:31 GMT Subject: Re: non-empty index with git commit -a Message-ID: <201102162203.40480.jnareb@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110216195931.GA22884@sigill.intra.peff.net> Dnia środa 16. lutego 2011 20:59, Jeff King napisał: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:55:54AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Jeff King writes: > > > > > But as I said, I am not against a config option if it is such a common > > > problem. I certainly would not turn it on. And I don't think it should > > > be on by default. > > > > I think we are pretty much on the same page, except that I am not very > > interested in the index-log either. > > To be fair, I am not sure I am that interested in the index-log either. > I just see it as a superior solution to the same problem, but I don't > consider it a very important problem. > > So I think we are really on the same page. :) Also it would be not as easy as reflogs - you would have either to save copy of index, or create a tree out of it and save reference in reflog. -- Jakub Narebski Poland