From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 04:33:55 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use a temporary index for interactive git-commit
Message-ID: <20101230043355.GA24555@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <1293670038-8606-1-git-send-email-conrad.irwin@gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:47:18AM +0000, Conrad Irwin wrote:

> Hitherto even an aborted git commit -p or git commit --interactive has
> added the selected changes to the index.

Hmm. I see how it could be confusing if you do ^C in "git commit -p" and
it actually commits what you had staged. But if I am reading the patch
right here:

> --- a/builtin/add.c
> +++ b/builtin/add.c
> @@ -378,7 +386,7 @@ int cmd_add(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	if (patch_interactive)
>  		add_interactive = 1;
>  	if (add_interactive)
> -		exit(interactive_add(argc - 1, argv + 1, prefix, patch_interactive));
> +		exit(interactive_add(argc - 1, argv + 1, prefix, patch_interactive, NULL));
>  

this behavior will not apply to "git add -p". So doesn't that introduce
a new confusing inconsistency, that ^C from "git commit -p" abandons
changes entirely, but from "git add -p" will silently stage changes?

-Peff