From: Thomas Rast Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:33:06 GMT Subject: Re: Understanding and improving --word-diff Message-ID: <201011081733.06502.trast@student.ethz.ch> In-Reply-To: Matthieu Moy wrote: > Matthijs Kooijman writes: > > > Lastly, the "porcelain" word-diff format seems a bit weird to me. Is > > the format specified somewhere, or are there any programs that use it > > currently? I couldn't find any users inside the git.git tree itself? > > There's a pending patch for "gitk --color-words". Actually, the > porcelain format was precisely implemented to allow this patch to > exist IIRC. Also, my intent was to specify the format fully under its option description. It's rather simple, but if you think the explanation/definition is inadequate, please provide a patch. We'd really want the writers of consumers (GUIs and such) to be very clear about how it is formatted. -- Thomas Rast trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch