From: Jonathan Nieder Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:24:59 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] commit: add parse_commit_repl() to replace commits at parsing time Message-ID: <20100818042459.GD21185@burratino> In-Reply-To: <201008180607.54675.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Christian Couder wrote: > The downside is that the sha1 will not be > consistent with the content anymore and that it will be more difficult to > realize that an object has been replaced as there will be no sha1 change to be > seen. Maybe in the long run it would make sense to keep a "replaced" flag and use it to mark the replace objects specially in some user-facing commands (like log --format=medium).