From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:10:57 GMT
Subject: Re: Merge commit subjects git.git
Message-ID: <20100719141057.GA13051@vidovic>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinTOMxWVM9kwhIfcG44SqOjpexY-Xy6kZYkemU9@mail.gmail.com>

The 18/07/10, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:33, Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> wrote:
> >        if (!strcmp("master", current_branch))
> 
> Wow, I thought the only place where we gave "master" any special
> meaning was in that we create it as the default branch. Can't we fix
> this to be less hard-coded?

To talk about pros and cons I wonder what would be the benefits of
changing this. I guess most projects probably best keeping the history
consistent for all the merge commit messages.

I think this is more sensible than giving the same behaviour /across/
different repositories (for only which not following the "master"
convention).

-- 
Nicolas Sebrecht