From: Finn Arne Gangstad <finnag@pvv.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:57:12 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] Introduce "double conversion during merge" more gradually
Message-ID: <20100701185712.GA22421@pvv.org>
In-Reply-To: <m3iq4znnfr.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:05:17AM -0700, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com> writes:
> > On 1. juli 2010, at 18:25, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> > > Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> writes:
> > >> Am 7/1/2010 11:09, schrieb Eyvind Bernhardsen:
> >>>
> >>>> +core.mergePrefilter::
> [...]
> >> 
> >> Somehow to me "prefilter" does not sound to convey what really is going on
> >> here, though.
> > 
> > "Doubleconvert" doesn't really mean anything either though, and
> > "convert" and "normalise" are too generic. I think the problem is
> > that there's no existing name for what convert.c does.
> > 
> > I chose "filter" because of the filter property; the crlf and ident
> > things can be regarded as built-in filters.  -- Eyvind
> 
> What about `merge.renormalize' ;-) ?

Best so far! Or what about "merge.canonicalize"? Sorry for bikeshedding :)

- Finn Arne