From: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@viridian.itc.virginia.edu>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 13:22:57 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blame: add a range option to -L
Message-ID: <20100503132257.CE99641205@viridian.itc.virginia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <7vvdb6uy2w.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano writes:
> 
 
> I am not interested in this patch very much myself, and after thinking
> about it, I think my dislike largely comes from this syntax, and not from
> the feature itself.  Any non-punctuation letter there looks like a sore
> thumb.  Either "-L 20??15" or even "-L 20+/-5" would have looked a _lo=
> t_
> saner.
> 

Ok, I've never been thrilled with the r either, but I couldn't come up
with anything better and I had assumed that you'd want to stick with
the <start>,<end> syntax.

-- 
Bill