From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:59:42 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2010, #02; Sun, 07)
Message-ID: <20100310195941.GA32387@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vvdd5t2lf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:58:04PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > With the current code, gitk (which calls "log --pretty=raw") barfs on a
> > repository with log.decorate turned on.
> 
> Yuck.  Do you mean we would need _at least_ something like this?  I am

Yeah, your patch fixes the problem.

> undecided if we should limit to FMT_RAW if that is the case, though.
> Reading from "git log --pretty=raw" is just as unkosher as reading from
> "git log --pretty=oneline", but a bigger question is do we still have
> enough plumbing support to replace them, or Porcelain "log" has advanced
> too much too quickly, leaving plumbing "rev-list" behind.

It looks like the switch to "git log" in gitk came from c961b22 (gitk:
Use git log and add support for --left-right, 2007-07-09), which in
turn comes from:

  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/51977

It looks like rev-list supports --left-right properly now (not sure if
it did back then or not), so if that was the only reason, it could
probably switch back.

I seem to recall there are other reasons to use "log" in a script, but I
can't remember any off the top of my head.

-Peff