From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:57:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] MSVC: Fix an "incompatible pointer types" compiler warning
Message-ID: <200912051257.21386.j6t@kdbg.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B1997A0.9000004@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>

[Removed Junio from Cc because IIUC, he prefers to be left out of the loop in 
Windows related matters until they have settled.]

On Samstag, 5. Dezember 2009, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> The patch is still marked RFC because:
>     - I'm still not sure if the flexibility to support both 32- and 64-bit
>       time_t is required.
>     - should -D_USE_32BIT_TIME_T be added to the Makefile?

If *not* using -D_USE_32BIT_TIME_T  produces a build or code base that is in 
some way superior, why should we require it? For example, its absence could 
help a 64bit build.

-- Hannes