From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:06:48 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tar: on extract, -o is --no-same-owner
Message-ID: <20091023210648.GA23122@mx.loc>
In-Reply-To: <20091023202524.GE4615@mx.loc>

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:25:24PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:15:43PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>>GNU tar-1.22 handles 'o' as no-same-owner only on extract,
>>on create, 'o' would be --old-archive.
>
>FYI this was prompted by:
>
>Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
>
>diff -rdup git-1.6.5.oorig/templates/Makefile git-1.6.5/templates/Makefile
>--- git-1.6.5.oorig/templates/Makefile	2009-10-11 03:42:04.000000000 +0200
>+++ git-1.6.5/templates/Makefile	2009-10-23 21:43:06.000000000 +0200
>@@ -50,4 +50,4 @@ clean:
> install: all
> 	$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(template_instdir_SQ)'
> 	(cd blt && $(TAR) cf - .) | \
>-	(cd '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(template_instdir_SQ)' && umask 022 && $(TAR) xfo -)
>+	(cd '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(template_instdir_SQ)' && umask 022 && $(TAR) x --no-numeric-owner -f -)

argh, sorry! --no-same-owner of course.

>Someone should try to ask the git people not to rely on getopt
>permuting options.. xof would be gentle to folks who don't want
>to turn on getopt_long though.