From: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:21:49 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/17] Return of smart HTTP
Message-ID: <20091022192149.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091015204543.GP10505@spearce.org>

Quoting "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>

> Actually, after some further research, the bug is not Johan's but is
> actually Daniel's.  Johan, I apologize for claiming it was your bug.
> ...
> Long story short, transport_close() is what is supposed to perform
> the work that disconnect_helper does, as its the final thing right
> before we free the struct transport block.  Free'ing the data block
> inside of the fetch or push functions is wrong.
>
> Its fine to close the helper and restart it within the single
> lifespan of a struct transport, but dammit, don't free the
> struct helper_data until transport_close().

Ping? Are there any progress on this issue?

-- 
Nanako Shiraishi
http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/