From: Nicolas Sebrecht Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:17:30 GMT Subject: Re: Pair Programming Workflow Suggestions Message-ID: <20090916141730.GA24893@vidovic> In-Reply-To: The 16/09/09, Tim Visher wrote: > > Pairing, on the other hand, is much more > tightly integrated than that. Just like in Brian's post, it's really > a situation of Dev1 _&_ Dev2 wrote this feature, but one of them > happened to be typing and doing most of the nitty-gritty developing. > Changing the authors between committs almost seems to introduce an > arbitrary level of distinction where it's no longer _both_ but _one > then the other_. Does that make my question any clearer? FMPOV (and to follow the Pair Programming purpose), there isn't an "I" in "Pair". So having the same author name and sign-off for each pair is what makes most sense. IMHO, "dev1_and_dev2" is actually the best option. -- Nicolas Sebrecht