From: Johan Herland Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:56:30 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH next] t7407: use 'cut' utility rather than bash's substring expansion notation Message-ID: <200908200856.30359.johan@herland.net> In-Reply-To: On Thursday 20 August 2009, Brandon Casey wrote: > From: Brandon Casey > > The substring expansion notation is a bashism that we have not so far > adopted. There is precedence for using the 'cut' utility for extracting > a substring. So do so here. > > Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey > --- > t/t7407-submodule-foreach.sh | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/t/t7407-submodule-foreach.sh b/t/t7407-submodule-foreach.sh > index de1730d..44ea8ac 100755 > --- a/t/t7407-submodule-foreach.sh > +++ b/t/t7407-submodule-foreach.sh > @@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ cat > expect < $nested2sha1 nested1/nested2 (heads/master) > $nested3sha1 nested1/nested2/nested3 (heads/master) > $submodulesha1 nested1/nested2/nested3/submodule (heads/master) > - $sub1sha1 sub1 (${sub1sha1:0:7}) > - $sub2sha1 sub2 (${sub1sha1:0:7}) > + $sub1sha1 sub1 ($(echo $sub1sha1 | cut -c 1-7)) > + $sub2sha1 sub2 ($(echo $sub1sha1 | cut -c 1-7)) Typo (both in the original, and the patch), should be: $sub2sha1 sub2 ($(echo $sub2sha1 | cut -c 1-7)) > $sub3sha1 sub3 (heads/master) > EOF Otherwise: Acked-by: Johan Herland Thanks, ...Johan -- Johan Herland, www.herland.net